Recent Posts
- 1/27/21 RABBI DR. SHMULY YANKLOWITZ EXPLORES “WHEN JUDAISM MEETS SCIENCE”
- 9/6/20 RABBI ARNOLD RACHLIS EXPLORES “WHEN JUDAISM MEETS SCIENCE”
- 8/9/20 RABBI GEOFFREY MITELMAN EXPLORES “WHEN JUDAISM MEETS SCIENCE”
- 4/23/20 THE WISE ONES OF COVID GUBERNIA AND THE WEARING OF MASKS
- 4/19/20 “WHEN JUDAISM MEETS SCIENCE” AT BETH EMET
- 3/30/20 CORONAVIRUS, THE HALAKHA, AND THE COUNCIL OF EXPERTS
- 3/2/20 JUDEOLOGY EXPLORES “WHEN JUDAISM MEETS SCIENCE”
- 2/17/20 JUDAISM AND REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCE: BE FRUITFUL AND MULTIPLY. BUT HOW?
- 10/27/19 RABBI RICHARD ADDRESS EXPLORES “WHEN JUDAISM MEETS SCIENCE”
- 10/16/19 RABBI WAYNE DOSICK EXPLORES “WHEN JUDAISM MEETS SCIENCE”
Most Viewed Content
- Ginger Jews
- A Nice Jewish Shot: Why Vaccinations are Kosher and Required
- The Cosmos, Oneness and Judaism: Are Pantheism and Panentheism Kosher for Jews?
- What if Cyrus Had Not Freed the Jews?
- Science and Judaism: Biblical Numbers, Mathematics and Attributed Patriarchal Ages
- Isaac Asimov, Two Foundations and the Jews
- The Curious Consensus of Jews on Abortion
- The Battle for Jerusalem and the Origin of Fake News — 2700 Years Ago
Tags
Archives
Site Search
Subscribe to receive new posts:
“a rare masterpiece”
– Rabbi Lawrence Hoffman, HUC
“careful research, passionate analysis, and good sense”
– Rabbi David Teutsch, RRC
“clear, engaging”
– Rabbi Geoffrey Mitelman, Sinai and Synapses
“a tremendous tome”
– Rabbi Wayne Dosick, SpiritTalk Live!
“an absolutely fascinating book”
– Rabbi Richard Address, Jewish Sacred Aging
“scholarly, judicious, and fair–minded . . . and very ‘readable’”
– Ronald W. Pies, MD
“a fresh way to explore Jewish topics . . . useful in teaching adults”
– Rabbi Gail Shuster–Bouskila
“A must read! . . . careful thought and such literary excellence”
– Rabbi Jack Riemer
Upcoming events
Posts Tagged ‘humanism’
JEWISH SOCIOLOGY: PEW’S IMPRECISE AND MISLEADING CONSTRUCT OF “JEWS OF NO RELIGION”
Credit: Pew Research Center
Of the many interesting aspects of the recently released survey of Jewish Americans by the Pew Research Center (the “Pew Portrait”), perhaps none is more troubling than the distorted bisection of American Jews into two primary sub-groups, one labeled “Jews by religion” and the other “Jews of no religion.” Once those designations were established, Pew, among other things, then sought to determine whether members of the two sub-groups had different attitudes or characteristics, whether, for instance, a person assigned to one sub-group was more likely or less likely to believe or behave differently than a person assigned to the other.
How large is the group of “Jews of no religion?” Pew found that about one fifth of adult American Jews (totaling approximately 1.2 million individuals) were Jews of “no religion” and that among Jews born after 1980 (“Jewish Millennials”) the fraction increases to one in every three. (See Portrait, at 7, 23, 32/214.) Pew’s survey director reportedly said that the rise in the number of Jews “of no religion” was the most significant finding of the study.
Just as one might expect, as soon as the Pew Portrait was published, the commentary class waxed wise on Pew’s findings about the Jews of no religion. Much of the concern expressed was about related findings that Jews of no religion were less connected to the Jewish community, less likely to be involved in Jewish organizations and less likely to raise their children as Jewish. (See Portrait, 60-62, 67-69/214.)
In all the hubbub, an important fact seems to have been overlooked: not only is the label “Jews of no religion” awkward, nowhere in the more than two hundred pages of the Pew Portrait does Pew precisely define what it means by “religion.” Pew’s failure to do so has created unnecessary ambiguity and confusion and muddled its survey results. At one point Pew says that Jews of no religion are “also commonly called secular or cultural Jews.” (See Portrait, at 8/214.) But those characterizations were not offered as primary choices in Pew’s survey questionnaire. (See Portrait, at 177, 186/214.) A look at the survey, beyond the executive summary, reveals some of the problems of Pew’s binary construct which is, perhaps, more provocative than probative. read more