Subscribe to receive new posts:


Available Now!
When Judaism Meets Science


“a rare masterpiece”
– Rabbi Lawrence Hoffman, HUC

“careful research, passionate analysis, and good sense”
– Rabbi David Teutsch, RRC

“clear, engaging”
– Rabbi Geoffrey Mitelman, Sinai and Synapses

“a tremendous tome”
– Rabbi Wayne Dosick, SpiritTalk Live!

“an absolutely fascinating book”
– Rabbi Richard Address, Jewish Sacred Aging

“scholarly, judicious, and fair–minded . . . and very ‘readable’”
– Ronald W. Pies, MD

“a fresh way to explore Jewish topics . . . useful in teaching adults”
– Rabbi Gail Shuster–Bouskila

“A must read! . . . careful thought and such literary excellence”
– Rabbi Jack Riemer

Upcoming events

There are no events to display

Sportin’ Life Was Right, But What About That Tune

Tuesday, July 12, 2011 @ 09:07 AM
posted by Roger Price
Share Button

George Gershwin

When Wall Street Journal drama critic Terry Teachout reviews a show, theater goers should pay attention.  And when the review is about a show that is mounted as rarely as is Porgy and Bess, special attention is in order. See, So it was that I attended the Court Theatre production of Porgy, the last stage work of George and Ira Gershwin.

How many times have Sportin’ Life and Spinoza appeared in the same sentence? This could be it.   Spinoza be damned. Wellhausen, too, for that matter. Undoubtedly the dope peddling conman Sportin’ Life who lived on Catfish Row in 1930s Charleston, South Carolina – at least in the musings of the Gershwin boys and writers DuBose and Dorothy Heyward – never delved deeply into higher Biblical criticism. And yet, he hit the nail on the head, didn’t he?

Singing “It Ain’t Necessarily So,” the most famous tune in the show after “Summertime,” Sportin’ Life chided, even taunted, the more reverent and traditionally minded folks on Catfish Row about some familiar but not so credible Biblical stories such as David slaying Goliath, Methuselah lasting nine hundred years (actually 969, but who’s counting), and Jonah living in the whale. And to underscore his point, Sportin’ Life would sing:

It ain’t necessarily so.

It ain’t necessarily so.

De t’ings dat yo li’ble

To read in de Bible

It ain’t necessarily so.

Now Sportin’ Life could have gone further. Putting aside for the moment the stories about divine beings mating with human females (see, Genesis 6:1-4) and winged creatures with multiple faces and a single leg (see, Ezekiel 1:4-9), each of which can be forgiven as fanciful excesses in the name of literary license, the Bible contains a number of statements which are anachronistic or not factually accurate. For example,

–        Parashah B’reishit (Gen. 1:9-12) asserts not simply, and incorrectly, that the Earth was formed before the Sun, but that plant life emerged before the Sun was around to fuel photosynthesis on which plants depend.

–        Parashah Lech L’cha (Gen. 14:14) describes how Avram (later Avraham) sought to rescue his nephew Lot with an army of allies pursuing Lot’s captors all the way north to the town of Dan in the Huleh Valley. The town was named after Avram’s great-grandson (Yaakov’s fifth son), but Dan was not yet born at the time of the military adventure. (See, Gen. 25:7-8; 30:6.) In fact, he was not born by the time Avraham died. Moreover, the town in question (originally Laish) was not named Dan until it was conquered hundreds of years later, according to other entries in the Bible. (See, Joshua 19:47-48; Judges 18:26-29.)

–        Parashah Toldot (Gen.  26:1, 8, 15, 18) relates that Yitzchak, in the days of Avraham, went to Avimelech, King of the Philistines. The setting for the visit is the migration of Avraham’s family, but the time for that story must have been hundreds of years before the emergence of the Philistines, the first evidence for whom dates to around 1200 BCE.

Obviously if Sportin’ Life really got into it, Porgy and Bess would be an even longer production than it is, and considerably duller. So Sportin’ Life stuck to a few of the better known and easier to understand stories.

And then he did something quite curious. To convey his point that the Bible was not error free, Sportin’ Life sang his famous refrain to what sounds like a Jewish melody – – and not just any melody at that. The melody that Sportin’ Life seems to have used is essentially the same as that commonly invoked for the blessing before the reading of the Torah portion: Bar’chu et Adonai Ham’vorach (Bless Adonai the blessed One).

Of course, George and Ira Gershwin, who wrote the music and lyrics, respectively, for Sportin’ Life, were familiar with Jewish musical themes and motifs. The Gershwins were products of, if not a religious family, at least an intensely Jewish community on the lower east side of New York City at the turn into the twentieth century (CE). And while George may not have had a bar mitzvah, older brother Ira did, and George, as well as Ira must have been familiar with the melody for the Torah blessing.

So how and why did the melody for the Torah blessing get paired with the subversive lyrics about the errancy of the Bible?[i] Even given the musical melting pot that boiled in New York City in the first third of the twentieth century in America, surely this conflation could not be mere coincidence.  Song writing at the Gershwin level was too precise an art to allow for that possibility.

Were the Gershwins taking another, more subtle stab, at tradition by using sacred music for sacrilegious thought? Or were they saying quite the opposite? That while we can poke fun at the myths of our heritage, we still know our roots, we still understand the core values of our people and we still remember their practices.

Biographies of George Gershwin, and at least one seems to be published every year, typically spend very little, if any, time talking about his use of Jewish melodies. And at least one writer discounts the Jewish elements in George Gershwin’s melodies.

In response to the evidence some see in the use of minor 3rds, Rodney Greenberg argues that “to be really Jewish” a song would need augmented 2ds, as, for instance, in Fiddler on the Roof’s “If I Were a Rich Man.” Greenberg contends that some are just hearing what they want to hear.[ii]

More recently, University of Houston music professor Howard Pollack has published the most extensive and thorough George Gershwin biography. Among its over 700 pages of text and over 100 pages of endnotes is what appears to be a robust, if not exhaustive, catalog of Gershwin’s use of liturgical and other Jewish musical themes.[iii] The continued use of such melodies                       over time strongly suggests that we are not simply hearing what we want to hear.[iv]

Barely a handful of years before Porgy and Bess, George Gershwin signed a contract with the Metropolitan Opera Company to write an opera based on Szymon Ansky’s The Dybbuk (a wandering disembodied spirit), itself derived from an old folk tale.  He even began to create some music for the work.[v] The effort failed because certain rights could not be obtained.

It is possible, then, that George Gershwin just wanted to include in his American opera a melody that he had planned to use on the aborted Dybbuk project. After all, both Catfish Row and the old country shtetl were communities that were financially poor, politically oppressed and rooted in cultural and religious traditions. And yet, it is one thing to use Jewish ritual music in a work about a fictionalized Jewish community and quite another to collaborate with a descendant of Southern aristocracy and slave holders like DuBose Heyward to write about a black community and incorporate a sacred Jewish melody into that work.

Mordecai Kaplan, one of the great Jewish thinkers of the last century, reportedly tried to dispense with the rendition of Kol Nidre which immediately precedes the evening service for Yom Kippur, but ultimately failed to do so in large part because he could not abandon the haunting melody that accompanies the reading. Perhaps the same was true of the Gershwins, creators of quintessentially American music. Perhaps something like that musical pull was at work here, in the sense that the Gershwins could stay out of shul, but the shul stayed in the Gershwins. Perhaps their use of the Torah blessing theme was their homage to their heritage. Unfortunately, unless someone discovers a letter to one of their contemporaries like Yip Harburg, Harold Arlen or Oscar Levant or, perhaps, an entry in a diary, we may never know what the Gershwins had in mind.

We do know, however, that “It Ain’t Necessarily So” was an enormously powerful piece. In 1943, with the second World War raging, Porgy and Bess made its European debut in Copenhagen at the Royal Danish Opera. Not surprisingly, the Nazis were not enamored with the production of a show written by Jews and about blacks. (Apparently, they did not give much credit to the DuBoses.) Despite the efforts of Hitler’s thugs to shut the show, it was successful in Denmark, and ran in repertory into the Spring of 1944. By then, though, the Nazis had had enough, and the Luftwaffe was threatening to bomb the Royal Opera unless production ended, which it then did.

Though George had died in July, 1937,[vi] the Gershwins would not be silenced. In response to Goebbel’s propaganda, the Danish resistance, bless ‘em, would interrupt enemy broadcasts with those wonderful words (in Danish) to that very special tune: It Ain’t Necessarily So! It Ain’t Necessarily So! It Ain’t Necessary So![vii]

Some may consider this conveyance of truth to power, by way of a sacred chant in a most unconventional manor and setting, to be a minor proof of the existence of God. And some may not.

Regardless, we should all be able to agree: S’Wonderful. S’Marvelous.

Who could ask for anything more?


[i] At least two sources agree that the music of “It Ain’t Necessarily So” came before the lyrics. See, Howard Pollack, George Gershwin His Life and Work (2006) (at 576); Walter Rimler, George Gershwin  An Intimate Portrait (2009) (at 145).

[ii] Rodney Greenberg, George Gershwin (1998) (at 191).

[iii] Pollack, at 42-47. A decade before Porgy, George Gershwin acknowledged that “traditional Hebrew religious melodies have had a marked influence upon modern music . . . .” Id. at 42; see also, Larry Starr, George Gershwin (2011) (at 179 n.2).

[iv] See, Joan Peyser, The Memory of All That (1993) (at 236-37, 248).

[v] See, Rimler, at 40.

[vi] There were simultaneous bi-coastal funeral services for George Gershwin. In New York City, Rabbi Nathan Perilman presided at Temple Emanu-El. In Los Angeles, Rabbi Edgar Magnin officiated at Temple B’nai Brith, now known as Wilshire Boulevard Temple. See, Pollack, at 214-15; Peyser, at 298-99.

[vii] See, Robin Thompson, The Gershwin’s Porgy and Bess (2006) (at 160); Rimler, at 171.

Share Button

3 Responses to “Sportin’ Life Was Right, But What About That Tune”

  1. Jordan Franzel says:

    Just read your s’wonderful blog. Kol HaKavod! I really enjoyed it and have often pondered whether the Gershwin’s consciously used that melody. As a composer, I often insert a snippet of a melody from nusach or trop but I do it consciously!! I can imagine that George and Ira did so as well.
    Thank you. BTW have you heard the CD “Brian Wilson Reimagines Gershwin” ? It’s a real fun listen. I recommend it.

  2. Larry Kaufman says:

    You know about the mother who gave her son two neckties for his birthday, and when he wore one of them the next time he visited her, she asked, “What’s the matter, you didn’t like the other one?”

    To say that I loved this post is not to say that i didn’t like the other ones! And, as promised, I plugged it on the Beth Emet blog,

    Keep up the good work!

  3. David Landau says:

    Well done, Roger Price!

    I agree with you completely — if the confluence of Torah Blessing Melody and Biblical Criticism was not fully in his conscious mind, then, at the very least, it was in the front of his unconscious mind. 😉

    Just yesterday, we read about being carried on the wings of eagles. Another example of the way I like to think of it — everything in the Torah is completely true… even if it did happen that way… and the truths are what we learn from the stories about how to live life.

    I also like your mentioning of the attempt to “dispense with the rendition of Kol Nidre.” I heard a nice vort on that this year: The way a Bet Din can annul a vow is by establishing that the person would never have made the vow if he knew at that time what he knows now. And, similarly, we want that our actions annulled because, similarly, if we knew then what we know now, we wouldn’t have done those things.

    Anyway, thank you for your post and for bringing these things to the front of my consciousness.

    Be well.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *